Sandra Bullock : MeeT My Baby !

The media scoundrels think they're know-it-alls. But Sandra Bullock proved them wrong this week when the actress we have all been paying so much attention to for the past month appeared on the cover of PEOPLE magazine with her new baby boy Louis Bardo Bullock - who she adopted in January. Yeah, do the math. That's three months ago !
With all the scrutiny surrounding Sandy's mattiage, how did they possibly miss such a monumental event in the actress life. Well, this proves that no matter how well the media think they know our celebrities, their insight into their lives is often strickly limited by what they want the media to know.
"Obviously Sandra Bullock has a very tight circle around her of family and friends.," explains Hollywood Life senior reportr Corynne Steindler. "Everyone aaaumed she was hiding out because of the humiliation Jesse James brought upon her, so I don't think anyone imagined there was another reason for her secrecy ! A new baby is such a happy thing, and now we all know that she wasn't being ashamed or hiding out in embarrassment - she was a mother protecting her newborn. Adoption documents are obviously kept private , but the paper trail to maintain a secert this big had to be a long one. Sandra had been working on this adoption for four years, and yet no one who dissects such things was any the wiser. That means that nearly everyone around her is fiercely loyal and that some of the folks involved obviously signed serious confidentiality agreements.
She most likely had all parties involved sign non-disclosures that probably carried with it a hefty dollar amount if any information was revealed. Shandra may have also used a fake name, as many stars do like when they travel and stay in hotels, explains 'Cult of Celebrity' author Cooper Lawrence.
Then, there's the divorce filing, which is generally public record and free for every person - and news agency - to peruse. Bullock kept the tabloids and bloggers off her back by going rogue, in a sense, adding a bit of mystery to her divorce filings.
In the papers, which TMZ has, Bullock uses her initials (backwards ) "B.A.S" instead of a name for herself, and also refers to Jesse under his initials,"J.G.J." Strangely, the document also states that "there is no child under eighteen years of age or otherwise entitled to support who was born or adopted of this marriage and none is expected.
The story has had magazine editors shaking their heads all morning . I spoke to one who was unable to stop yelling, What the F !" There have been paparazzi on Sandra's behind since the lead-in to Oscar season and more so after Jesse James indiscretions were made public. You can bet those paps were trying desperately to shoot inside her house and her backyard ! Stars can't protect themselves from most thingd, but like a lion will do anything for it's cubs, a mama can find ways to shield her baby from the tabloids.
"A woman can't always protect herself from her Nazi-loving girlfriends, but she can protect the sanctity of the bond with her child, particularly at such an important , formative moment of their relationship," explains Katherine Rosman, author of the memoir ' If You Knew Suzy,' which is about her own bond she had with her late mother. Stay tuned : the saga continues.
My spin on the good news: Way to go Sandra, keep your business close to the chest...when you are ready, that's the time to let the media know. What a beautiful baby and he will be a joy to you keep him close to your heart and he will make you proud. Sandra you are like the gril next door , wholesome and very down to earth, you are a lady in all sense of the word and Jesse James with his low-life a** don't deserve you, he's beneath you so let him crawl back under the rock with his tattooed gal-pals.